Close

6 mayo, 2021

Asymptomatic and Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infections After BNT162b2 Vaccination in a Routinely Screened Workforce

A 2-dose regimen of the BNT162b2 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech) against SARS-CoV-2 was authorized in December 2020 based on reported 94.8% efficacy.1 Although an association between vaccination and a reduction in symptomatic disease has been well described, an association with asymptomatic infection remains unclear.2,3

Methods

In March 2020, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital initiated routine, test-based screening of asymptomatic workers and targeted testing for symptomatic individuals and those with known exposure. Polymerase chain reaction–based testing of midturbinate samples from asymptomatic employees was performed at least weekly. On December 17, 2020, vaccination with BNT162b2 was initiated. “Vaccine-eligible” workers were individuals meeting state vaccination guidelines.4 Vaccinated employees receiving BNT162b2 were followed up from their first dose date. Unvaccinated employees were followed up from December 17, 2020, or their first asymptomatic screen result, whichever was later. The end of surveillance was March 20, 2021, employment termination, a positive test result, or receipt of other vaccines, whichever was earlier. No person contributed to both groups. Individuals with prior COVID-19 exposure were excluded. When asymptomatic infections were analyzed, symptomatic and known exposure cases were treated as competing risks; when symptomatic infections were analyzed, positive results from asymptomatic screening were treated as competing risks.

The incidence rate ratio (IRR), the ratio of confirmed COVID-19 cases per person-days of follow-up in vaccinated compared with unvaccinated groups, with 95% CIs,5 was used as a measure of association between vaccination and infection. An analysis by time after dose 1 and 2 was also performed. Cumulative incidence curves were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Analyses were performed in R version 4.0.3.

The study was determined by the St Jude institutional review board to be exempt (secondary use of data), for which participant informed consent is not required.

Results

Between December 17, 2020, and March 20, 2021, 5217 workers met vaccination criteria, 3052 (58.5%) received at least 1 BNT162b2 dose, and 2776 (53.2%) received 2 doses; 2165 (41.5%) were unvaccinated. Median follow-up was 81 days in the unvaccinated group and 72 days among vaccinated employees. In the vaccinated group, 66.0% were women, 60.3% White individuals, 19.4% Black individuals, 88.7% younger than 65 years, and 47.2% health care personnel6; in the unvaccinated group, 58.3% were women, 40.3% White individuals, 24.6% Black individuals, 84.8% younger than 65 years, and 25.7% health care personnel.

Among vaccinated employees, 51 tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 during follow-up (41 before and 10 after the second dose); 29 (56.9%) were diagnosed through asymptomatic screening. Among unvaccinated employees, 185 tested positive and 79 (42.7%) were asymptomatic. The IRR was 0.21 (95% CI, 0.15-0.28) for any SARS-CoV-2 infection, 0.28 (95% CI, 0.18-0.42) for asymptomatic screen results, and 0.16 (95% CI, 0.10-0.25) for symptomatic or known exposure cases (Table). The IRR within the first 11 days after the first dose was 0.58 to 0.60 for all 3 outcomes. The IRR for positive results via asymptomatic screening from 12 days after the first vaccine dose until the second dose (median interval between doses, 21 days [range, 11-49 days]) was 0.58 (95% CI, 0.30-1.13), within 7 days after the second dose, 0.35 (95% CI, 0.11-1.09), and 7 days or more after the second dose, was 0.10 (95% CI, 0.04-0.22). There were no positive symptomatic or known exposure cases more than 7 days after the second dose. Unvaccinated employees had higher cumulative incidence of a positive test result than vaccinated employees, and higher incidences of positive test results via asymptomatic screening, for symptoms, or for known exposure (Figure).

Discussion

This study found an association between vaccination with BNT162b2 in hospital employees and a decreased risk of symptomatic and asymptomatic infections with SARS-CoV-2. Limitations include the observational design; short follow-up time; small cohort size, which led to an inability to match the 2 groups and unequal follow-up; differential temporal risk during the surveillance; and that the group choosing not to be vaccinated may have been more prone to higher-risk behavior. The unequal follow-up time and the latter 2 limitations may have biased the results in favor of vaccination. Further research is needed to determine whether a reduction in risk of asymptomatic infection leads to reduced transmission.


Créditos: Comité científico Covid

Deja un comentario

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *